Playlists
|
The name speaks for itself.
|
Favoris
(480)
Abonnés
(12)
Amis
(119)
Commentaires sur la chaîne
(488)
|
dsglop
(il y a 14 heures)
anom
"I didn't expect to be debunked." Why are you asking questions you don't want answered? |
|
|
ninefangthesniper
(il y a 15 heures)
Hola chica
listen i've been looking aroun youtube and people want to make a series on street fighter so i'm going audtion for fei-long , vega and ryu but i just hope i get fei-long i do a good i'm pression of the character i'm not sure if chun li is be consider for a part in the series but i'll let ya know so yeah just thought u should know |
|
|
Eregeras
(il y a 22 heures)
Pretty much everyone does, but Occam's Razor narrows down the possible scenarios to consider. The most likely explaination for any number of coincidences was that they were fuck ups and the government account covers-up government and military fuck ups. Contradictory and baffling media messages at the time are common in the 24-hour news cycle: a news organisation speculates early and later on words, emphasis and context are changed to make it seem like the news was not milking events for higher viewing figures by sensationalist speculation(the sole cause of Osama Bin Laden being named as the prime suspect without evidence just hours later).
To insert more insidious complexity into the scenario requires evidence. There must be evidence of intention, conspiracy and it must be MORE likely than the 'people fucked up' null hypothesis. |
|
|
anom01y
(il y a 1 jour)
I am just questioning the government/corporate powers in general, I didn't expect to be "debunked". It should be straight forward common sense to ask questions when the government produces the 9/11 report which doesn't even include WTC7.
Then you watch the NIST video, and it sais Thermal Expansion caused WTC7 to collapse. |
|
|
Eregeras
(il y a 1 jour)
...and just to point out another thing you actually managed to gloss over rather than take into consideration.
A common tactic among cranks, wingnuts and liars is to BURY the little voice of reason in massive quantities of claims, half-truths, coincidences, quote-mines and sound-bites. They do this because they know that whilst bullshit can be made up in seconds, refuting it with reason and truth takes a lot longer and doesn't have the same rhetorical effect. This isn't 'proof'. It's a very old way of manipulating the 'Arrogant Ignorant', tried and tested since politics was invented. |
|
|
Eregeras
(il y a 1 jour)
You are most certainly not 'looking for the truth'. Like all troofers, that is a barely-disguised, outrageous, disengenous invoking of the passive-aggressive pleading that has come to characterise the movement.
You came into my channel and left four examples of supposed evidence of a 9/11 conspiracy and declared them to be true, as if their veracity is directly bonded with that of the jibbering claims associated with them. If you're so even-handed, why didn't you also leave four pieces of evidence contradicting the batshit lunacy of trooferism? |
|
|
dsglop
(il y a 1 jour)
I'm getting sick of wasting my time on people like you who claim to be seeking the truth but reject the answers wich are presented time and again.I never claimed that I always act maturely.When truthers act like little kids I'll return the favour.
|
|
|
anom01y
(il y a 1 jour)
Dsglop:
Well don't be immature and I will not ban you. Your videos with your drawings that you made and your immature tone of voice question your ability to hold a conversation. I really really don't like wasting time, thanks. I am just trying to learn the truth. I am taking in all sides of the story, conspiracy researchers, and debunkers, because you do have to watch out for misinformation. The debunkers can only go so far though, and are quite outweighed by due to the vast number of coincidences, anomalies, and evidence proving conspiracie(s) during 9/11. |
|
|
dsglop
(il y a 1 jour)
anom is one of the few people I have blocked.He will say the same thing over and over again.If you go on his channel and tell him why he is wrong he will delete your comments and block you.
|
|
|
anom01y
(il y a 1 jour)
"Truthers tend to be herded around by spin doctors who make a LOT of money out of their followers."
you mean Alex Jones ? David Icke ? Alex Jones claims many many times that he is not in it for the money, He Puts all his videos on Google video for free!! and tells people to burn them and give them to other people. David Icke, on the other hand, does so much research, that he doesn't have time to make money otherwise. So, doing research is his job. It just so happens that more and more people are listening to him, and want to listen to him, as opposed to the spoon-fed propaganda laden lying manipulating mainstream media who uses sorcery and neuro-linguistic/subliminal programming to get its message across. Jordan Maxwell is a poor man with hardly any money, and is dying of cancer. Aaron Russo Died of cancer too. |








