I've been debating so many evolutionists (With Master and Ph.D. degree) and I am REALLY astonished how even evolutionists contradict themselves over and over. Not only had they never won me but instead I been correcting evolutionists over and over using only facts and not ideas. And they all end up trying to disprove religion, creation or God.

I used to believe in macro-evolution but after I understood it I definitely deny it. Most of evolutionists' arguments are REALLY old school arguments and most of the time their arguments had anything to do against creation or God.

Macro-evolution is a coward strategy hiding behind the facts of Micro-evolution to justify Macro, which is a shameful and a coward strategy to deceive fools.

After while, this really is waste of time talking over and over of same things with many different evolutionists believing they have new and better concepts, just because someone give you an explanation of the facts the explanation itself doesn't become a fact.

When there're many explanations for facts and someone keep only one to make it fit into their religion call evolution then that is call ignorance by denying all possible explanations.
-HushAndLearn

God bless.